Mathematical aptitude is not one of my widely acclaimed talents, however, this algorithm I do get: meeting a guy or a girl you like and want to hang out with for most or all of your life is a statistical process that can calculated on the basis of numbers and time. Theoretically, the higher frequency at which you meet new people, the lesser the time it is likely to take to arrive at meeting a person you really like. Other relevant variables can also be considered within the wider equation, like geography and social demographics.
A while ago, I was having a conversation with my mother, dramatically relaying my account of disbelief that I still had not met someone since arriving back home from overseas months earlier.
‘Why don’t you move to Moura?’, she said. ‘Umm, okay…’
Apparently, this small Australian town in the centre of Queensland has a significantly high rate of single men versus women.
‘What would I do there Mum?’ ‘Oh, you can work in the mines darl.’ ‘Okay…….’
Then, on to what I had surmised to be the greatest flaw in this plan: succeeding at it would likely mean an extended, unknown length of time living in Moura. Plus, I had only recently unhinged my life of six years living on the opposite side of the world, bought an apartment full of furniture and started a new job. Even for my family, who for a while moved to a new place every two years without batting an eyelid, this seemed a little excessive.
I must clarify here, my Mum is a consistent and excellent provider of valued advice and it’s these types of bold recommendations that I enjoy receiving the most. And while the statistical merits of this proposal were robust (and I liked the undercurrent that when it comes to matters of love anything is reasonable), on this occasion, I decided to stay put and try my luck in the city.
A more obvious place to play the Numbers Game is at work: a collective pool of people you are mandated to associate with week in and week out. Perfect. It should stand to reason also, that the more people at work, the better the odds. However, it is here, depending on career choices made, that the demographics variable can skew the equation both ways.
At my previous workplace, for example, there were thousands of people based at the office. My girlfriends would say to me: Surely there is someone good at work! Well, if by good, they meant males in their late forties married with 2.5 children, then yes, the line-up was extensive. I suspect my counterparts at Google may have been dealing with more suitable candidates. There is of course, gold to be found in even the most challenging of places, it simply requires a more attentive focus: I have a colleague who does an industrious job of weekly floor walking to scout for new talent. And I did end up spotting a few good ones at my old work, but at the time I was hovering somewhere around a no-dating-colleagues policy. This policy has since been discarded as counterproductive and entirely unnecessary.
A friend was telling me the other day about a friend of hers who had played a great Numbers Game. She made an online dating deal with herself to go out with twenty guys and stop under no circumstances until the target had been achieved. It was, as you’d expect, a mixed bag, but she persevered and completed the twenty dates. She’s engaged to Number Seventeen.
Like most of us now, I know a lot of people who’ve met their partners online. Whichever method you prefer, the base principle of finding somebody is one we’re all aware of: one will not meet Boy or Girl while sitting at home on the couch watching TV. One will meet Boy or Girl while out doing things: at a friend’s wedding; at a work event; at a gig; on a Friday night in a bar; on Tinder; at a boxing class; where you buy your coffee; helping a friend move house; on a blind date; when the fire alarm goes off in your apartment block and never-before-seen neighbours emerge via emergency on the footpath.
There will be a multitude of time for television-watching once Boy or Girl has been located.
Being out a lot does of course come with its taxes (I personally think staying in wearing a high pony, tracksuit pants and my blue t-shirt with the panda on it from the Asian pop-up shop is a wonderful way to spend a few hours after a long day). However, I do imagine some of the most successful of women have put as much strategy into finding someone they like as they have into finding their killer jobs. I don’t think I’ll start creating mind maps on interactive digital white boards, but I do try to loosely run by three rules.
One: Go to everything.
Two: Alternate between a no-drink/minimum-drink maximum across nights to ensure event-going is sustainable throughout the week.
Three: Go on at least two dates with a guy unless on the first date there is a clear and present reason why a second date should not occur.
A few weeks back, we booked a woman called Sally the Psychic to come into work. She was a surprise special guest at our colleague’s farewell, enlisted to provide some hot tips on what the future might hold as our friend embarked on her journey home to New York City. I picked Sally up from reception, briefed her, then took her on a quick detour to a near-by office so we could have a chat about a few things. Now I have a fourth rule: as long as you agree with it, believe everything fortune tellers say.
—–









